The next gift Paul mentions is the gift of interpretation of
tongues (v 10). This gift is someone who is able to interpret another tongue or
language. I am bilingual and can speak English and Spanish but I would not say
that I have this gift necessarily. Some have a natural gift or ability to learn
a foreign language. It was not natural nor did it come easy for me. For those
who this is easy, then they may be imbued with such a gift. If anyone was
speaking in tongues in the church, there absolutely had to be someone there to
interpret or they were to be silent. And no more than one person was to speak
in tongues because there is only one interpreter available to translate at a
time. If several were speaking in tongues at the same time, there would be
confusion and God is not the author of confusion, but He is the God of order (1
Cor 14:33). It would not be edifying the church to have several speaking in
tongues at the same time and with no one to interpret. Tongues are a sign for
unbelievers and not for the church. Paul writes, “In the Law it is written:
‘With other tongues and through the lips of foreigners I will speak to this
people, but even then they will not listen to me, says the Lord.’ Tongues,
then, are a sign, not for believers but for unbelievers” (1 Cor. 14: 21-22).
Isaiah 28:11-12 is where Paul quotes Isaiah the prophet, “For with stammering
lips and another tongue will he speak to this people. To whom he said, ‘this is
the rest wherewith ye may cause the weary to rest; and this is the refreshing:
yet they would not hear.’” This clearly indicates that the gift of tongues
(Greek for languages) and the interpretation of them is that of a known
language as a witness to unbelievers.
Paul wants to make clear
that we should not elevate one gift over another but esteem each and necessary
for the completeness of the Body of Christ as Paul says in I Corinthians
12:12-23, “Now if the foot should say, ‘Because I am not a hand, I do not
belong to the body,’ it would not for that reason stop being part of the body.
And if the ear should say, “Because I am not an eye, I do not belong to the
body,” it would not for that reason stop being part of the body. If the whole
body were an eye, where would the sense of hearing be? If the whole body were
an ear, where would the sense of smell be? But in fact God has placed the parts
in the body, every one of them, just as he wanted them to be. If they were all
one part, where would the body be? As it is, there are many parts, but one body.
The eye cannot say to the hand, “I don’t need you!” And the head cannot say to
the feet, “I don’t need you!” On the contrary, those parts of the body that
seem to be weaker are indispensable, and the parts that we think are less
honorable we treat with special honor.”
No comments:
Post a Comment