"Every people, group, religion and
fundamentalist of the world has its view of eschatology. It cannot help raising
the question of the whither, as well as of what and the whence? '0, my Lord,'
said Daniel to the angel, 'what shall be the end of these things?' (12:8). what
is the end, the final destiny of the individual? Does he perish at death, or
does he enter into another state of being; and under what conditions of
happiness or woe does he exist there? What is the end, the final aim of the
great whole, that far-off divine event towards which the whole creation moves?
It is vain to tell man not to ask these questions. He will ask them, and must
ask them. He will pore over every scrap of fact, or trace of law, which seems
to give an indication of an answer. He will try from the experience of the
past, and the knowledge of the present, to deduce what the future shall be. He
will peer as far as he can into the unseen; and, where knowledge fails, will
weave from his hopes and trusts pictures and conjectures.
"The Christian view of the world
also has its eschatology. The Christian view, however, is positive, where that
of science is negative; ethical, where it is material; human, where it is
cosmogonic; ending in personal immortality, where this ends in extinction and
death. The eschatology of Christianity springs from its character as a
teleological religion -- it seeks to grasp the unity of the world through the
conception of an end or aim." -- James Orr.
This is probably the hardest of all the
doctrines of Christianity to be received. If we ask the reason why, we receive
various answers. Some would tell us that this doctrine is unwelcome to many
because they feel themselves guilty, and their conscience tells them that
unless they repent and turn to God this awful doom awaits them. Others believe
that it is because the thought of future punishment strikes terror to people's
hearts, and therefore this doctrine is repulsive to them. To others again, the
thought of future anguish seems utterly incompatible with the fatherly love of
God. Yet it is acknowledged to be a remarkable fact that both Jesus and John,
who more than anyone else in the New Testament represent the element of love in
their lives and teaching, speak most of the future anguish of the wicked.
That future punishment of the wicked
holds a prominent place in the teachings of the Scriptures there can be no
reasonable doubt. What is between the covers of the Bible is the preacher's
message. Yet great care must be exercised in the teaching or proclamation of
this doctrine. After all it is not the saying of hard things that pierces the
conscience of people; it is the voice of divine love heard amid the thunder.
Yet there must be no consciousness of
cowardice in proclaiming the doctrine of future retribution, however awful its
delineation may be. Fear is a legitimate motive to which we may appeal, and
while it may be classed among the lower motives, it is nevertheless true that
it is the only motive that will effectively move some people to action.
No comments:
Post a Comment